In a case of first impression, the New Mexico Court of Appeals has held that State employees on probationary status may still assert a claim of sex or race discrimination under the New Mexico Human Rights Act (HRA). See Rodriguez v. NM Workforce Solutions, 2012-NMCA-059.
Attorney, arbitrator, mediator and ALJ Pilar Vaile discusses updates and issues of interest in Labor and Employment law, from the perspective of an ADR Professional. For more information on the author, please see www.pilarvailepc.com.
Disclaimer and Notice
THIS BLOG SITE IS INTENDED AND DESIGNED FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY, AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE EITHER LEGAL ADVICE OR THE FORMATION OF AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
Showing posts with label Title VII. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Title VII. Show all posts
Friday, September 21, 2012
NM Probationary Employees Protected by Human Rights Act
Labels:
1983,
age,
continued employment,
discrimination,
employment law,
expectancy,
Human Rights Act,
Personnel Act,
probationary employee,
property interest,
sex,
Title VII
Sunday, July 3, 2011
Retaliation Claims Up and Robust, Discrimination/Harassment Claims Struggling
In the June 2011 issue of the ABA Journal, David L. Huston Jr. observes a trend of the U.S. Supreme Court being more favorably inclined to employment retaliation claims, than underlying discrimination claims. Of all discrimination-related charges filed in 2010, retaliation charges were up to 36.3 percent, from 27.1 percent in 2000. Some recent retaliation highlights:
Labels:
ADEA,
employment discrimination,
FLSA,
retaliation,
Section 1981,
Title VII
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)